Wednesday, 30 April 2014

Design Process

Firstly we studied current pointless boxes to find out exactly how they worked. Which is that the switch being turned on activates a motor with a gearbox upon it this then turns a shaft with the arm on it. The arm has a certain profile because of this it opens the box lid as it moves towards the switch, it then turns the switch off, the switch going off also triggers the motor to reverse to bring the arm back to its original position. We would be building upon these principles.




The same motor as used in other pointless boxes would be used, this motor would be mounted upon and internal rib mounted in the base of the box, the arm would be custom made by us, and this was due to the different sizing of our box in comparison to other pointless boxes. We would have to be careful that the profile of the arm was correct to lift the box lid, but not too fast or too slow. As with the other pointless boxes our arm would be mounted on the shaft coming out of the gearbox on the motor. This gearbox gave high torque and low RPM from the motor; this is exactly what we needed for the arm, as the switch is quite stiff. When the arm reached the top of its movement, and switches the main switch off, this would activate a micro switch which would then activate the second phase of the system. This micro switch would activate a second motor, which would be slightly more powerful than the other; this is because it would be powering the movement of the box.

We planned to have the box move roughly 30cm when the second phase was initiated. The motor has a gearbox on it already which again gives high torque and low RPM, but not as low as the other motor. The motor would be connected to a shaft which would power the axle, therefore the wheel. Also upon this shaft would be two cams interacting with micro switches, the first cam would be to turn the motor off after it had travelled 30cm, the second cam would slow the motor down by activating a resistor. This is because we needed to have some form of control over the automation.

The next phase was to design the panels of the box. The top of the box would split in the middle, where the switch would be mounted just over to one side. The other side of the lid would be on hinges so the arm can open it with the correct movement and profile. The sides of the box would be plain and simple. The side panels will all have slots and tabs in so they fit together perfectly and are easier to attach together. The base of the box would be more complicated, with slots needed for the wheels and various mountings needed for the internal workings. The panels themselves would be attached together with glue as this is the simplest and most effective way of mounting each component to one another.


Initially, the group agreed that the material to be used for the construction of the useless box would be 2mm clear acrylic. The thickness was sufficient to give the box the required strength and rigidity, but not too thick so as to reduce internal space and increase weight. However, after some consideration, it was decided instead to opt for 3mm thick black acrylic.
The reasons for this were:
1.) Clear acrylic would show off the internal workings of the device, which detracts away from the personification idea (although this would make the engineering design available to scrutiny)
2.) 2mm thick is a relatively uncommon size; 3mm is much more readily available and therefore considerably cheaper

This meant that some of the designs already completed would have to be altered, as they were originally based around working in 2mm thick material.

We would now use Solidworks to design all of our parts to be laser cut and order parts we needed to start making our box.

Sunday, 20 April 2014

Assignment Brief

We have been tasked with the design and manufacture of a toy/device that utilises a mechanical system with feedback via sensors to alter mechanical behaviour.
Our group has decided on a variant of the “Useless Box” (http://youtu.be/aqAUmgE3WyM). The useless box is activated with a toggle switch, an arm appears out of the box which then turns the device off. Our variant adds an extra degree of motion, in that once the arm has turned the device off a drive motor then causes the box to “back away” from the operator.
This system uses motors, limit switches and some basic circuitry in the design.
Other criteria that the device must adhere to include:
- Have moving parts.
- An on-board power source.
- Parts produced using CNC and manual processes.
- Fit inside a 250mm cube.
- Cost no more than £40.